Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Norbert Gombos vs Daniel Michalski Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gombos vs Michalski analysis and find out who is favored!
Norbert Gombos vs Daniel Michalski Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Gombos 0 - 1 Michalski
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gombos has won 45.92% of points on his second serve, while Michalski has won 50.38%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gombos, in recent form, has won 44.69% of his opponent's second serve points, while Michalski has won 51.78%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.18% and 34.09% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gombos has saved 47.95% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Michalski has saved 58.74% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gombos has won 29.03% of matches played (W/L 9/ 22), with Michalski winning 53.33% (W/L 32/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gombos has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 256/ 182), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 39% (W/L 9/ 14). Michalski has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 181/ 95), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 5/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Gombos has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 28% of matches (W/L 7/ 18), where as Michalski has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 41.67% of matches (W/L 15/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gombos winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Gombos winning 1 and Michalski winning 2. The last match between Gombos and Michalski was at the Prague Challenger, 05-05-2024, Q1 round, Clay with Daniel Michalski getting the victory 6-4 3-6 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:11:48.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gombos and Michalski have played a deciding set 1 times, with Gombos winning 0 times and Michalski 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Gombos winning 0, and Michalski 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gombos has played against opponents with an average rank of 299.16 while Michalski has played against players with an average rank of 245.13.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gombos has won 38% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Michalski has won 42% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gombos has converted 40.82% of breakpoint opportunities, and Michalski has converted 46.15% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gombos 0 - 1 Michalski
509
Rank
80
High
33
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
334
Rank
243
High
24
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
56% (517-401)
Career Total W/L
62% (214-131)
22% (2-7)
YTD W/L
50% (14-14)
$1,135,685
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Norbert Gombos | Daniel Michalski |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
| Games Won | 11 | 15 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:11:48 | 2:11:48 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (44/79) | 54% (44/81) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 66% (29/44) | 66% (29/44) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 43% (15/35) | 59% (22/37) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (3/8) | 63% (5/8) |
| Return Points W% | 37% (30/81) | 44% (35/79) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 3-6 6-1 |
Stats 
Daniel Michalski
Player
Norbert Gombos
54%
(
44 of
81)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
79)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Norbert Gombos | Daniel Michalski |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 22% (2/7) | 50% (14/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 27% (6/16) | 49% (31/32) |
| Games Win/Loss | 41% (86/123) | 49% (294/307) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 14% (1/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 29% (2/5) | 61% (11/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 67% (2/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.29 | 0.14 |
| Aces Total | 30 | 41 |
| DFs per game | 0.33 | 0.21 |
| DFs Total | 34 | 62 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:45:29 | 1:54:40 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 361.11 | 308.96 |
| 1st Serve % | 53% (334/628) | 61% (1242/2028) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (222/334) | 63% (780/1242) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (135/294) | 50% (396/786) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (20/49) | 46% (84/182) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (240/664) | 41% (799/1951) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 25% (2/6) | 43% (9/12) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/1) | 71% (5/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 22% (2/9) | 50% (14/28) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 70% (7/10) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (2/4) | 57% (4/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 93% (15/14) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 7% (15/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (8/2) | 0% (13/0) |
Norbert Gombos Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Norbert Gombos
54%
(
44 of
81)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
79)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Bautista Otegui
Player
Norbert Gombos
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
53%
(
23 of
43)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
60
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vitaliy Sachko
Player
Norbert Gombos
59%
(
50 of
85)
1st Serve %
44%
(
36 of
82)
5
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
30 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
90
Total Points Won
77
|
5-7 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Norbert Gombos
Player
Orlando Luz
50%
(
46 of
92)
1st Serve %
56%
(
59 of
105)
4
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
6
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
39 of
59)
57%
(
26 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
35%
(
32 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
43 of
105)
103
Total Points Won
94
|
4-6 6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Norbert Gombos
Player
Evgeny Karlovskiy
62%
(
53 of
85)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
88)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
2
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
34 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
88)
93
Total Points Won
80
|
4-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Rottoli
Player
Norbert Gombos
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve %
41%
(
29 of
71)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Cezar Cretu
Player
Norbert Gombos
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Harry Wendelken
Player
Norbert Gombos
47%
(
31 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
71)
7
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
2
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Henri Squire
Player
Norbert Gombos
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
12
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
88%
(
35 of
40)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
29 of
36)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
24%
(
16 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
20 of
58)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francesco Forti
Player
Norbert Gombos
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
10
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
3
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
34 of
43)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
16 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
23 of
71)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Michalski Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Daniel Michalski
45%
(
35 of
77)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
4
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
6
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
34 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
41 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Daniel Michalski
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
17 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
43 of
75)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Norbert Gombos
54%
(
44 of
81)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
79)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Daniel Michalski
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Branko Djuric
48%
(
31 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
37 of
66)
1
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
73%
(
24 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marcello Serafini
Player
Daniel Michalski
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
73%
(
63 of
86)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
36 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Luigi Sorrentino
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Dax Donders
50%
(
31 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
71%
(
22 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tommaso Compagnucci
Player
Daniel Michalski
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
52%
(
48 of
92)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
44%
(
37 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Michele Ribecai
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Gombos Vs Michalski Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Daniel Michalski
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
